I didn't expect to be given an ¨optimistic¨ and ¨friendly¨ rating for this lol.
Im not totally against capital punishment, and I think it is appropriate for certain offenses. But Ive heard that like back in the 80s or 90s that dna tests proved that alot of the people executed for crimes they were accused of commiting were actually innocent.
Thats my biggest issue with it. The chance that innocent people could be killed, while the actual perpetrator feels safe cuz someone else took their place.
There are crimes where its totally not wrong to take their life as punishment, though. But I actually would support waiting a few years in advanced to do it, both for the reason mentioned above, but also to give them time to repent for what theyve done (not to escape the punishment).
Personally, I think disenfranchisement is a bigger problem, especially in the United States.
Well I don't have a hard stance on this or even a stance on this at all really but I took a class before on disenfranchisement in the United States. That is, how people who have committed felonies are treated like second class citizens in the US after being released. It really opened up my eyes to say the least.What do you mean? Whos affected by this?
Depends on what you were in for. If all you did was own weed then you shouldn't be treated like you killed someone.Well I don't have a hard stance on this or even a stance on this at all really but I took a class before on disenfranchisement in the United States. That is, how people who have committed felonies are treated like second class citizens in the US after being released. It really opened up my eyes to say the least.
What really grinds my gears (besides the political ¨correctness¨ craze right now) is how the rulers of an increasing number of countries think that the tensions between Russia and North Korea and other contries is a justification for re-establishing or enstricting conscription. Recently Morocco re-established it, and so did Sweden, and Israel also follows this trend by making the rules for mandatory service even stricter than they already were.
As a (passive) conscientious objector (I have never been drafted) this worries me, concerning how contries often threat the rights objectors have. All of this because infantile leaders are too dumb to solve conflics in a decent manner, that is, without militarisation and seem to prefer violence and hostility above peace.
You know what i learned to hate?
These Assholes that keep hogging an desk at Fast food Restaurants with nothing but a drink and just sit there on their asses using the free Wifi while people like me who actually have food on plates and look for a place but guess what.
There is no free desk because there are these Internet adicted no-lives everywhere...
Especcially on a desk for 4 deapite being alone and having just a drink.
Sometimes i want to walk over to one of them and punch my Big Mac into their throat!
I once had a job where I had to walk an hour and a half to get home after work was done, and Id often stop in at the bk half way to sit and rest and have a cool drink. Id sit there for 15 to 20 minutes alot of the time cuz I was so sweaty and tired and just wanted to cool off and rehydrate.
I get that you need a place to sit too, but dont be too critical of people who dont have food on their table.
I for one, want to be drafted. I tried enlisting but was rejected.
You don't need to. Just say that you have issues with serving in an army, or are supporter of a pacifist organisation. Or just pretend you have back issues or something like that.I would flee the country if I were ever drafted >.>"