You're right.
The men need to show more skin.
The men need to show more skin.
THAT'S THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT I WANT TO HAPPENThe men need to show more skin.
It's "pretty sad" that people are enjoying the entertainment provided to them? I mean, it's not a great argument!Its pretty sad, and not a serious thing at all.
THAT'S THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT I WANT TO HAPPEN
It's "pretty sad" that people are enjoying the entertainment provided to them? I mean, it's not a great argument!
You can't blame humanity - evolution made us this way. Blame that Darwin guy - what a loser!I don't have a problem with that sort of stuff in itself and it doesn't offend me I just wish people were less motivated by their crotches.
It's "pretty sad" that people are enjoying the entertainment provided to them? I mean, it's not a great argument!
That proves my point - people have chosen to sexualize one gender over the other. It's not objective at all - if a majority of people make videos about how the sky is red, is the sky suddenly red?If there are an overwhelming number of "sexy" videos of female wrestlers, as compared to male ones, we can reasonably deduce that male wrestlers are indeed less sexualized.
I disagree completely... obviously, if there's an audience for something, it makes sense to appeal to that audience (especially from a financial standpoint)!That female sports and physical entertainement (how do I the words) are entirely viewed through the prism of cheesecake and are viewed/not allwoed to be respectable in other ways, however, is not particularly cool
Who are the "people affected"? The women doing said wrestling? I mean, it's not like they didn't specifically choose to take up the career of female wrestling!"People" generally means the people being pandered to, not the sexualized folk. You're using the argument that just because it happens to be that a group of people said "hey this is okay" means that the people affected think it's okay.
not Galaga and Pac-man