Huh, how do you mean?People with a "twitchy" style of typing.
Huh, okay. I can't imagine that. :PThere are some people who type in this way that seems very twitchy and almost seems like their hands are having spasms. As a result, their typing is a lot noisier than most other people's.
When you open the curtains in the morning and you get the sunlight blasted into your face at full power.
Speaking of which doesn't it suck when you check your phone late in the night and the brightness is at max?When you open the curtains in the morning and you get the sunlight blasted into your face at full power.
Speaking of which doesn't it suck when you check your phone late in the night and the brightness is at max?
I know, i'm a bad kid for checking my phone at night. Please don't tell.Don't do that!
It's not technically wrong, I suppose. Revisionist history just means to argue for a different narrative than what is the mainstream narrative for a certain history, even if it's wrong. I mean yeah the success of a video game vs. a catastrophic event are two completely different scales but it's not an outright incorrect usage of the term.In the past years, I've seen morons on message boards use the term "revisionist history" to talk about opinions they don't like rather than like, actual revisionism, and it drives me nuts. "Donkey Kong Country didn't sell well and wasn't well-received by critics" or "Donkey Kong Country wasn't influential in the adoption of pre-rendred sprites" would be revisionism. Someone not liking DKC that much and puittting it somewhat low in an opinion-based list isn't. Before this was adopted by low-IQ neogaf posters desesperate to give an air of legitimaty to their opinion about children video games by using Big Words wrong, it was a term most used in referal to holocaust denial. No matter how much you like Donkey Kong Country or how well it was received at release, thinking Donkey Kong Country is a good game is an opinion and not a fact forever etched in the stones of time.
It's not technically wrong, I suppose. Revisionist history just means to argue for a different narrative than what is the mainstream narrative for a certain history, even if it's wrong. I mean yeah the success of a video game vs. a catastrophic event are two completely different scales but it's not an outright incorrect usage of the term.